Ideological Research Essay
|
Name:
[Student’s name added here]
|
Mark:
[Final grade or mark added here]
|
Quality of argument and evidence
|
|
++++
|
+++
|
++
|
+
|
-
|
|
Convincing, thorough, accurate response to the task
|
|
|
|
|
|
Response does not accurately address task
|
Analytic
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descriptive
|
Argument developed
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weak, no argument
|
Logically developed and structured
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lacks logic, rambles
|
In depth research into critical positions
|
|
|
|
|
|
Little or no research in critical position apparent
|
High level of understanding and application of
critical position
|
|
|
|
|
|
Does not understand or use critical position well
|
Well supported by evidence and examples
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inadequately supported by evidence and/or examples
|
Accurate presentation of evidence and examples
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inaccurate presentation of evidence and examples
|
Written expression and presentation
|
Fluent and succinct, excellent presentation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clumsily written, verbose, untidy
|
Correct punctuation, grammar and/or spelling
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorrect punctuation, grammar and/or spelling
|
Concise, thorough synopsis that feeds into analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
No synopsis
|
Appropriate length
|
|
|
|
|
|
Over/under length
|
Sources/referencing
|
Adequate number of scholarly, task-appropriate
references
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inadequate number of references/inappropriate choice
of references
|
Adequate acknowledgement of sources
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inadequate acknowledgement of sources
|
Correct and consistent in-text referencing style
(MLA)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorrect and/or inconsistent referencing
|
Works cited list is error-free
|
|
|
|
|
|
Errors and inconsistencies in works cited list
|
Comments:
[Student’s or lecturer’s comments added here]
|